Opting Out for Clarity’s Sake
- May
- 31
- 2013
- Posted by Tammy Ditmore
- Posted in Editing, Language
I got a thick envelope this week from the mortgage lender that now owns my house. As I glanced through several pages about disclosures and RESPA requirements, a sentence at the top of the last page caught my eye.
You do not need to notify us if you decide not to opt out.
Wait—what?
I make my living parsing sentences; I translate jargon into common English, reset fractured syntax, and mend malapropisms. After three decades as an editor, I’ve become quite skilled at divining an author’s intended meaning, even if I have to pull a sentence apart word by word to find it.
But after reading this sentence multiple times, I’m still not entirely sure I know what it means. The less-than-helpful instructions relate to the mortgage lender’s privacy policies. I THINK I understand this to mean that if I fill out some papers and mail them back, then the lender can’t share my information willy-nilly. And I THINK it means they can do whatever they please with everything they know about me if I don’t mail back the papers. But I am CERTAIN that the lender would prefer me to do nothing at all, which is why they have crafted this sentence to be as confusing as possible.
I spend my time as an editor choosing just the right word, setting up the perfect sentence structure, smoothing out rough spots where readers could get bounced out of the text or tripped up by confusing phrases.
And I have to tip my hat to the writers at Vericrest Financial. Because there is no way a sentence that confusing just “happens.” Every word was carefully chosen and precisely placed so that the lender has fulfilled its legal obligation to inform customers of their privacy rights–but made it far more likely that customers will just toss the papers aside rather than claiming those rights.
Language can be crafted to obscure just as much as it can be used to illuminate. Vericrest Financial proves it.
3 Responses so far.
Search
Blog Categories
Contact
Testimonials
Tammy’s approach to editing was like telling a story to someone who listens very well and offers suggestions only when something is confusing or grammatically incorrect (or embarrassing).
Tammy is sensitive to my work and does a great job to maintain the integrity of my writing and my voice!
She worked with me chapter-by-chapter over the course of nearly a year to hone my writing through attention to style, organization, and mechanics. Her close reading and keen eye have been invaluable during my revision process. I learned important guidelines about preparing my manuscript for its final review through this pleasant experience of working with her.
Tammy has helped me become a better writer. I always look forward to seeing her email pop into my inbox. As I open the email and double click on the Microsoft Word file, I look forward with anticipation to reviewing her edits. Like a used target at a shooting range there are red marks riddled throughout the page. And the right column is full of thoughtful comments. I appreciate her precision and thoroughness. Because I know every word she cuts, every crooked sentence she straightens, and every p… Read more
Tammy Ditmore is an excellent editor. My writing improved grammatically, in structure, and clarity under her skilled eye.
I highly recommend Tammy Ditmore to you. She has edited three of my books in the past two years. Each time, I have been impressed with her professionalism, and pleased with her ability to provide a polished text.
Personally, I feel the editing process is the most important aspect of writing–it can be a nightmare if the editor and the writer are not on the same page. … Tammy knows what she is doing, she is easy to work with, and she delivers on time.
I had a book manuscript that had a thorough edit by a copy editor, but there were many changes made and I wanted another set of eyes to look at it carefully. So I hired Tammy Ditmore to do a “final” proofread and flag anything that she found awkward, confusing or ill-fitting. That is a difficult job—to look both for errors and to comment, but that is what I needed. Tammy took it on and did a great job. Tammy also understands a schedule and finished the work on time—even ahead of time. Thank … Read more
Tammy Ditmore’s timely, thorough, detailed and accurate proofreading made my book print ready. She delivers high quality work on schedule and is a pleasure to work with.
I wanted to take a moment and thank you for your wonderful work. I marvel at your eye for detail and your ability to make a written text so much better.
My ex-father-in-law was an attorney who cared (and still does) passionately about the importance of the law to civilized society. He also has a very deep love of well-written prose. As you can imagine, in 40 years of practice, he developed an allergy to the sort of writing in your example. Like you, it was always clear to him that many such instances are carefully crafted to deceive or at least confuse, and cannot be written off as mere carelessness. It was also very clear to him that this sort of shenanigan, allowed to flourish, leaves us all in a less-civil society. Think of that amazing phrase from the Brown v. Board of Education decision, “with all deliberate speed.”
Dangit! Like/As got me again. Second time this month – – Margaret spotted one that got out into the wild via a press release.
Jim, I tend to think they must offer classes in law school to help students learn how to write this way. Something like: Writing Unclearly 302: In this class, you will practice writing conventions that will help you cloud all intent. Time will be spent practicing the use of double negatives, unclear antecedents and run-on sentences. Much of this course will be dedicated to mastering the use of passive voice.