Quoteable
- May
- 12
- 2011
- Posted by Tammy Ditmore
- Posted in Editing, Publishing, Writing
As an editor, I spend a lot of time perfecting punctuation marks and verifying information. Determining where an author’s words end and a quote from another source begins can be one of my most difficult challenges. And yet, protecting an author from claims of plagiarism is one of an editor’s most important tasks.
Last week, as news of Osama bin Laden’s death spread around the world, so did a “quote” from Martin Luther King, Jr.: I will mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that.
I admired the sentiment and, knowing that King had consistently preached nonviolence, I never thought to question its validity. Fortunately, the quote was not in a document I was editing because it was not quite accurate. Others were more skeptical than I was, and a little detective work on the part of some journalists and Facebook users revealed that Jessica Dovey, a Facebook user and middle-school English teacher, first posted the paragraph. Her original post was correctly punctuated to show that the first sentence—I will mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy—was her own. She then added words she admired from King, clearly marking the sentences as a quote. As her post was picked up and passed on, the quote marks and any mention of Dovey were removed, making it look like King had expressed the whole sentiment.
Megan McArdle, business and economics editor for The Atlantic, wrote about the quote, how it started, how it spread, and how the truth behind it was revealed in “Anatomy of a Fake Quotation,” http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/05/anatomy-of-a-fake-quotation/238257/. It is a fascinating look at how the partially misattributed quote was created by the relaxed rules and abbreviated formats of Twitter and Facebook and then disseminated through those media more quickly and widely than would have been fathomable even five years ago.
If you’re an editor, it’s a very scary story.
Search
Blog Categories
Contact
Testimonials
Tammy Ditmore’s timely, thorough, detailed and accurate proofreading made my book print ready. She delivers high quality work on schedule and is a pleasure to work with.
Tammy is sensitive to my work and does a great job to maintain the integrity of my writing and my voice!
Tammy is just amazing. Before my book made it over to Tammy, I had used two editors — one a well-known author in NYC. I was unhappy with the editing, and basically Tammy was my last try before I just set my book to the side. Not only did she totally understand my “voice,” but she reconstructed, added, and melded in ways I would have never considered. Use her, trust her. She’s the best!
I wanted to take a moment and thank you for your wonderful work. I marvel at your eye for detail and your ability to make a written text so much better.
I had a book manuscript that had a thorough edit by a copy editor, but there were many changes made and I wanted another set of eyes to look at it carefully. So I hired Tammy Ditmore to do a “final” proofread and flag anything that she found awkward, confusing or ill-fitting. That is a difficult job—to look both for errors and to comment, but that is what I needed. Tammy took it on and did a great job. Tammy also understands a schedule and finished the work on time—even ahead of time. Thank … Read more
Tammy’s approach to editing was like telling a story to someone who listens very well and offers suggestions only when something is confusing or grammatically incorrect (or embarrassing).
I can’t believe my good fortune to have found Tammy to edit my nonfiction book. I had narrowed down my editor search to ten; then I took advantage of their free sample offers. Nine of the editors were okay. Tammy’s edit, however, really showed her strength for detail and content development. I was absolutely wowed. She suggested, for example, how to improve the Introduction’s hook, added sentences that clarified a paragraph’s thought better, and deleted unnecessary words. She also mentio… Read more
This book has been a major effort for me over the past 15 years—both emotionally and in time commitment. Your feedback helped me give it structure. Your insightful questions encouraged me to go deeper in my understanding and intentions, which provided enhanced clarity. Your recommendations provided a professional perspective that I needed towards getting it published. Thank you so much! When entertaining any future writing projects, you will be the first person I contact.
Tammy Ditmore edited my book, The Quest for Distinction: Pepperdine University in the 20th Century. It was a huge assignment, requiring skills that set her apart from most professional editors. She recognized the key themes of the manuscript immediately and proceeded to examine each paragraph, actually each word, in light of those themes. The result was a briefer, more coherent manuscript that will be read with greater interest and understanding.
I appreciate Tammy’s willingness to ask questions when appropriate, flex on deadlines, offer sound advice, and rewrite sentences or sections as needed. Her command of substantive and copy editing make Tammy an asset to any project.